Introduction
Agra, one of the
important cities of Uttar Pradesh city is spread
over an area of 140 sq. km. along the banks of
the river Yamuna. The large scale migration from
rural areas has led to the congestion in the
city with very poor civic facilities. The total
urban population of Agra is 1,331,339.
Population density of Agra is 897 persons per
square kilometer as compared to the Indian
average of 324. According to the 1991 census,
the sex ratio of the city is 852 females per
1000 males. Total of 8.41 lakh people live in
slums, which is about 50% of the city’s
population.
Primary health care in Agra is provided
through 15 D-Type Health Centers (DTHCs). D-Type
health Centers are providing maternal and child
health and family welfare services to a
population of 50,000. But due to substantial
increase in the population of the city over
time, each health center is now catering to a
population of 70,000 to 100, 00. In such a
situation it is quite evident that the existing
primary health delivery system is inadequate to
respond to the health needs of the burgeoning
urban population, of which approximately 50%
reside in slums or slum like conditions. Slum
dwellers prefer to access private health
facilities due to better attention/services or
proximity of these services.
Nature of Project- Public Private
Partnership in various services is one of the
preferred ways of reaching out to underserved
communities all over the world. It is efficient
way of combining Government resources with non
government expertise. In this context of rapidly
expanding reproductive health services to
underserved urban areas, Government of India has
designated Urban Health Resource Centre to
develop samples urban health plan focusing on
urban poor. This centre carried out detailed
health analysis of Agra’s low income
settlements. After the request of Government of
Uttar Pradesh, PPP model health centre was
started by involving government officials, local
NGOs and community. The main objective was to
provide access to basic reproductive health
facilities to people living in low income
settlements.
The whole concept is based on two following
approaches:
Approach 1
Under this
the NGO partners provide reproductive health
services. They provide OPD services to under
served slum population. The urban health
intervention in Agra involves establishing Urban
Health Centre through partnership with local
NGOs to provide reproductive health services in
eight low-income settlements of the city, having
a total population of about 86,000 in 44 slums.
In the centre sterilization and other family
planning services are provided at negligible
cost to patients while for deliveries,
operations and diagnostic tests patients are
referred to Lady Lyall Government Hospital
Approach 2
Under this
NGOs are covering 24 slums by mobilizing
community and through outreach camps in these
areas. Mainly RCH services are provided and the
outreach team includes a doctor and community
link volunteers and Mahila arogya samitis.
Link Volunteers and MAS members identify the
needy women in the community and motivate
resistant women in the community to avail health
services. They also identify and support special
attention households. This is done
where already Government health centre exists.
This avoids duplication of services and also
strengthens public health system.
| 80 Link Volunteers,
each covering 1500-1800 population
43 women’s health groups promoted in
34 slums |

Public Private Partnership- Urban
Health Resource Centre is the coordinating
agency for developing sample urban health plans
focusing on urban poor. To improve health
conditions among the urban poor of Agra, Urban
Health Resource Center (UHRC) initiated an urban
health program in partnership with the
Government of Uttar Pradesh .The program
partners with 3 local NGOs to provide
reproductive health services in underserved slum
communities in Agra .The three local NGOs are
Family Planning Association of India (FPAI),
Naujhil Integrated Rural Project for health and
Development (NIRPHAD) and Shri Niroti Lal
Buddhist Sansthan (SNBS).
Involvement of Community- A key
strategy of the program is the promotion of
community collectives to enhance demand and
utilization of health care. This also helps in
furthering ownership of the program by the
community. This is achieved through Community
Link volunteers (CLVs) and Mahila Arogya Samitis
(MAS) (Women’s Health Groups). Community
Link Volunteers are married women from same
community. They are selected on the basis of
attitude, capabilities, sincerity and
willingness to serve the community to which they
belong. They act as a bridge between community
and services. They track beneficiaries and they
do a follow up on their health needs. They do
counseling for women on various health issues.
They motivate women and their family members on
availing various health services. They refer
cases to urban health centres. Mahila Aarogya
Samitis (MAS) comprises of women members from
the community who have keen interest on
community issues and are able to work
collectively. They are usually identified by
Community Link volunteers. Both CLVs and MAS
support outreach camps by ensuring women from
target group attends these camps. Capacity
building activities are undertaken by NGO
functionaries once a month on RCH themes
They manage community health fund for
meeting health emergencies in the slums. The community has actively supported this
project by starting a ‘health fund’. They
contribute Rs 25 monthly and lend this money to
women in need.
|
34 groups across 30
slums have collected a total of Rs.
45,500 for health purposes
|

Role of Government - The government co
ordinates with the local NGOs to provide support
.It provides monthly stock of vaccines and
essential medicines. The Health official
conducts periodic visits and gives suggestions
to improve the working conditions.
Accountalibility- All stakeholders
like NGO, community members, government
officials and UHRC representatives were engaged
in various consultations to assess the need
situation. They were involved in decision
making. A selection committee comprising
government officials and UHRC representatives
assessed capacities of potential partners and
after comprehensively checking their past
experience the NGOs were selected. Government of
Uttar Pradesh has requested UHRC to be the key
facilitator in operationalizing further such
initiatives.
Achievements
–
1. Service delivery has considerably improved
amongst the urban poor particularly women and
children in under served communities.
2. There is increase in institutional
deliveries, immunization coverage levels and
improved management of obstetric emergencies and
provision of basic curative care.
3. Capacity building of community is promoted
to achieve progressive improvement in not just
health practices but also sanitation and overall
empowerment.
|
Statement of Services from April 07 -
March, 08 |
|
|
Total
No. Of Patients |
ANC |
PNC |
FP
Advise |
Child
Examined |
Other |
|
322 |
217 |
11 |
127 |
12 |
82 |
|
257 |
181 |
9 |
115 |
7 |
60 |
|
605 |
268 |
17 |
148 |
63 |
257 |
|
284 |
233 |
4 |
119 |
14 |
33 |
|
298 |
241 |
8 |
118 |
8 |
41 |
|
591 |
274 |
16 |
118 |
43 |
258 |
|
318 |
260 |
4 |
117 |
11 |
45 |
|
402 |
334 |
7 |
170 |
5 |
56 |
|
532 |
247 |
6 |
111 |
45 |
234 |
|
321 |
264 |
5 |
114 |
9 |
43 |
|
101 |
58 |
2 |
41 |
23 |
18 |
|
390 |
193 |
5 |
128 |
30 |
162 |
|
4421 |
2770 |
94 |
1426 |
270 |
1289 |
Sustainability –
The project is
sustainable as long as there is interest on the side of the Government and the non
state partner can arrange funds to run the
health centers. Sustainability also depends on
the participation of the community. Unless and
until community does not have full faith and
trust in the service provider, such initiatives
fail to deliver effectively over the period of
time.
Strengths-
The main strength of the
initiative is community partnership in the
overall health service delivery. People were not
treated as simply passive recipients of services
but were active principlas who demanded
services. This was done through their capacity
building. This in true sense empowered people.
Weakness -
There was limited ownership
of the initiative amongst the government
officials. The MOU and other agreements were
signed by the government officials and Urban
Health resource Centre. But still Government
officials were very reluctant in claiming that
this project was their own initiative. They
admitted that the project is doing well but do
not wanted to be named. Unless Government takes
an upper hand in administering such new Public
Private Partnerships initiative, they will lose
their purpose and objective.
Replicability-
The program has good
potential to be replicated in other parts of
Uttar Pradesh. This is in itself model for Uttar
Pradesh Government for PPP activities.
Lessons Learned –
Before the implementation of Public Private
Initiative extensive consultations with
community to secure their support is must.
Area of
Improvement –
There should be proper agreement between the
government and service providers specifying
their respective roles and responsibilities,
especially with regard to the areas to be
covered, payments, supplies, reporting etc. All
the parties should stay committed to their
respective roles otherwise such initiatives can
be killed inspite of being useful to the poor
people.
Contact
Person – Mr Siddharth Aggarwal
Project
Location- Urban Health Centre,Trans Yamuna
Colony, Agra.
Contact
Address -
Delhi
Office
Urban
Health Resource Centre
B-7/122-A, Safdarjung Enclave
New Delhi – 110 029
Ph:+91-11-41010920 / 21
Fax:+91-11-41669281
Agra
Office
Urban
Health Resource Centre - Agra
73-B, Surya Nagar (1st floor)
Civil Lines, Khandari Road
Agra - 282 002
Ph: +91-562-3954921
Fax : +91-562-2522038